RAS Agricultural ScienceВестник российской сельскохозяйственной науки Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science

  • ISSN (Print) 2500-2082
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5200

Dynamics of damage by the buddle mite (Cecidophyes ribes West.) to collection varieties of black currant

PII
10.31857/S2500208224050094-1
DOI
10.31857/S2500208224050094
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 5
Pages
42-44
Abstract
The aim of research is to evaluate collectible black currant material according to resistance to bud mite in conditions of Kirov region, to study the dynamics of damage accumulation by a pest and to distinguish the varieties which have been showing the resistance for a long time. The evaluation of varieties had been held on the collectible plantations of fruit and berry crops of laboratory of FSBSI FARC of the North-East (Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Agricultural Research Centre”) (Kirov) which is situated in a central agro-climatic zone of Kirov region in 2014–2021. 36 black currant varieties of 2013 planting year were included in the research. The check variety is Vologda. The scheme of planting is 3.0 × 1.0 m, 5 plants on an every accounting plot. The repetition is single. As a result of a long-term study of the dynamics of bud mite damage accumulation, the varieties, which remain free from the pest longer than others were distinguished: Alexandrina (the features of the pest had not been noticed during the whole research); Dobriy Jinn (Kind Genie) and Gulliver (5.6% of the number of the studied) which showed the first damage on the 7th and 8th year after planting. Chishma, Yadrenaya, Mila, Vasilisa, Sputnick, Nezhdanchick (16.7%) showed the first features of damage on the 5th year of planting. The varieties with the resistance to a bud mite (47.2%) are promising as a basic material for bringing in a selection process and recommended for the production. The varieties with middle and low resistance to the pest can be recommended for amateur and commercial horticulture but as a basic material on resistance to a phytophage in selection, they are unsuitable. The analysis of a link between a degree of pest damage of studied varieties and productiveness showed an average negative relationship between these features (r = –0.62).
Keywords
устойчивость коллекция сортоизучение вредитель фитофаг Кировская область
Date of publication
18.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
4

References

  1. 1. Алпатова А.В. Особенности развития и вредоносности смородинового почкового клеща на красной и черной смородине // Селекция и сорторазведение садовых культур. 2021. Т. 8. № 1-2. С. 5–7. https://www.doi.org/10.24411/2500-0454-2021-10101
  2. 2. Бахотская А.Ю., Князев С.Д. Изучение интродуцированных сортов коллекции ВНИИСПК смородины черной по устойчивости к биотическим факторам, Вестник Российской сельскохозяйственной науки. 2020. № 3. С. 22–25. https://doi.org/10.30850/vrsn/2020/3/22-25
  3. 3. Вахрушева Н.С., Салтыкова Т.И., Софронов А.П. Итоги изучения элитных форм смородины черной селекции Федерального аграрного научного центра Северо- Востока // Садоводство и виноградарство. 2021. №3. С. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2021-3-5-15
  4. 4. Зейналов А.С. Почковые клещи на ягодных кустарниках // Защита и карантин растений. 2013. № 3. С. 45–48.
  5. 5. Князев С.Д., Левгерова Н.С., Пикунова А.В. и др. Селекция черной смородины: методы, достижения, направлении: монография. Орел: ВНИИСПК, 2016. 328 с.
  6. 6. Ламонов В.В., Жидехина Т.В. Динамика накопления повреждений почковым клещом сортами смородины черной с различной степенью устойчивости // Вестник МичГАУ. 2011. № 1. Ч. 1. С. 58–61.
  7. 7. Программа и методика сортоизучения плодовых, ягодных и орехоплодных культур. Орел: ВНИИСПК, 1999. 608 с.
  8. 8. Сазонов Ф.Ф., Евдокименко С.Н., Неброй К.Ю., Подгаецкий М.А. Оценка генофонда смородины черной ФГБНУ ФНЦ Садоводства по устойчивости к почковому клещу в условиях Брянской области // Садоводство и виноградарство. 2023. № 3. С. 28–36. https://doi.org/10.31676/0235-2591-2023-3-28-36
  9. 9. Fenton B. et al. Gall mite molecular phylogeny and its relationship to the evolution of plant host specificity // Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2000. № 24. P. 831–861.
  10. 10. Oldfield G.N. et al. Eriophyoid mites-their biology, natural enemies and control// Elsevier, Amsterdam.1996. P. 259–275.
  11. 11. Roberts et al. Morphological and ultrastructural studies in three species of cecidophyopsis mites in ribes // VI International Symposium on Rubus and Ribes. 2001. P. 612–624.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library