- PII
- S3034520025020012-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034520025020012
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 4-7
- Abstract
- The article presents the results of studying spring oat varieties bred at the Far Eastern Research Institute of Agriculture for drought resistance under laboratory conditions to determine seed sowing qualities under changing osmotic pressure and in soil and climatic conditions of the south of Khabarovsk region. In laboratory experiments, with an increase in the osmotic pressure of sucrose from 6 to 9 atm, seed germination in the Peredovik variety decreased by 14.7 percentage points, and in the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety by only 8.5. The proportion of germinated seeds in the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety at 6 atm was higher by 9.4 percentage points, and at 9 atm – by 15.6 percentage points compared to this indicator for the Peredovik variety. The advantage of the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety in reducing growth processes was revealed compared to this indicator for the Peredovik variety. In field conditions with a lack of moisture in July, when the amount of precipitation was 61 mm less than the norm, the Peredovik variety plants were 19.8 cm lower in height than the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety, and 3.4 g lower in 1000-grain weight, which is due to the variety’s response to the lack of moisture in the soil and the increased temperature regime during this period. As a result, the grain productivity per plant of the Peredovik variety was 2 g lower than that of the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety. A correlative relationship was found between productive tillering of oat varieties with the 1000 grain weight and grain productivity per plant. It was highest for the Peredovik variety (r = 0.89), while for the Dalnevostochny Zolotoy variety this dependence was average (r = 0.63). According to the research results, the spring oat variety Dalnevostochny Zolotoy showed greater resistance to drought compared to the Peredovik variety, which allows us to recommend it for inclusion in the selection process as a source of resistance to this factor.
- Keywords
- устойчивость стресс прорастание семян ростовые процессы зерно продуктивность семена урожайность кущение Хабаровский край
- Date of publication
- 18.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 6
References
- 1. Асеева Т.А., Трифунтова И.Б. Адаптивная реакция сортов и селекционных линий ярового овса в условиях Среднего Приамурья // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2022. Т. 36. № 4. С. 22–28. https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2022_36_4_22
- 2. Баталова Г.А. Некоторые аспекты устойчивости к лимитирующим факторам в селекции овса // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2013. № 2 (6). С. 52–58.
- 3. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). 5-е изд., доп. и перераб. М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. 207 с.
- 4. Кошкин Е.И. Физиология устойчивости сельскохозяйственных культур: учебник. М.: Дрофа, 2010. 638 с.
- 5. Любимова А.В., Мамаева В.С., Менщикова А.А. Генетическая засухоустойчивость современных сортов овса посевного как ответ глобальному изменению климата // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2022. № 06 (221). С. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-221-06-49-59
- 6. Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур: зерновые, крупяные, зернобобовые, кукуруза и кормовые культуры / ред. В.И. Головачев, Е.В. Кириловская. М.: Калининская областная типография, 1989. Вып. 2. 195 с.
- 7. Петункина Л.О., Свиркова С.В., Маевская Н.А., Старцев А.А. Физиологическая оценка устойчивости овса. Вестник КемГУ. 2012. № 4 (52). Т. 1. С. 20–24.
- 8. Сычев В.Г., Осипова Л.В., Курносова Т.Л. Патент № 2651284. Публ. 19.04.2018.
