The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions

Salimov, V. S.

doi:10.31857/S2500208224040083

PII

10.31857/S2500208224040083-1

DOI

10.31857/S2500208224040083

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

V. S. Salimov

Affiliation: Scientific Research Institute of Viticulture and Wine-making under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Azerbaijan

Volume/ Edition

Volume / Issue number 4

Pages

50-54

Abstract

Humates are widely used in viticulture, including ecological viticulture. Humic stuffs benefit the qualitative and quantitative indicators of the grape harvest and can reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. This article presents the results of tests on the foliar application of various doses of the “Rostok” fertilizer in the conditions of the Absheron zone of Azerbaijan on local varieties of table grapes – traditional Tabrizi and a selection variety of Scientific Research Institute of Viticulture and Wine-making Ganjavi, grown in the Ampelographic collection of the institute, located on the Absheron peninsula. Fertilizer was applied in three doses – 0.5; 1.0 and 1.5 liter per hectar. Under the influence of the fertilizer, such elements of yield as the vigor of shoot growth, the number of opened buds, fruitful shoots, the number of berries in a bunch, the weight of a bunch, as well as the sugar content of berry juice increased. Fertilizer application had a positive effect on eliminating signs of leaf chlorosis. No toxic effect on the vegetative organs of the grape plant, on its development, or on the beneficial insect fauna of the vineyard was noted. Based on the data obtained, as well as calculations of economic efficiency, a four-fold application of fertilizer (twice before flowering, once after, once during veraison) at the rate of 1 liter per hectare was recommended for widespread use in wine-growing farms.

Keywords

Апшеронский полуостров гуминовые кислоты сорта винограда внекорневое внесение эффективность

Date of publication

18.09.2025

Year of publication

2025

Number of purchasers

Views

References

1. Захаренко В.А. Оптимальные экономически обоснованные уровни использования пестицидов и минеральных удобрений в земледелии // Журнал Всесоюзного хим. о-ва им. Д.И. Менделеева. 1984. Т. 29. № 1. С. 15–21.
2. Лукьянов А.А., Антоненко М.В., Гапоненко Ю.В., Гонтарева Е.Н. Влияние факторов среды ампелоценоза на формирование качественных показателей вина. Научный журнал КубГАУ. 2015. № 112(08).
3. Поволоцкая Ю.С. Краткий обзор гуминовых препаратов. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. Vol. 5-1. С. 37–40. https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10854
4. Радчевский П.П., Мороз С.Б., Трошин Л.П. Применение биологически активных веществ гумата при выращивании виноградного посадочного материала. Научный журнал КубГАУ. 2010. № 60(06). http://ej.kubagro.ru/2010/06/pdf/28.pdf
5. Тихонова М.А., Мурсалимова Г.Р. Влияние гуматов и биорегуляторов на ростовые процессы винограда. Современное садоводство – Contemporary horticulture. 2018. № 1. С. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-6701-2018-10112
6. Хардикова С.В., Алехина Г.П., Верхошенцева Ю.П. Влияние гуминовых препаратов на эколого-физиологические особенности саженцев винограда в условиях города Оренбурга. (Вестник Оренбургского Государственного Университета. 2017. № 8 (208). С. 99–102.
7. Шепелева В.В., Каменева Н.В. Применение регуляторов роста для повышения урожайности винограда технических сортов. Плодоводство и виноградарство Юга России. 2018. № 49(01). С. 76–85. http://journalkubansad.ru/pdf/18/01/07.pdf.
8. Cataldo E., Fucile M., Mattii G.B. Biostimulants in Viticulture: A Sustainable Approach against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Plants (Basel). 2022. No. 11(2). P. 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020162
9. De Moura O., Berbara R., Torchia D. et al. Humic foliar application as sustainable technology for improving the growth, yield, and abiotic stress protection of agricultural crops. A review, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2023. Vol. 22. Issue 8. РР. 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2023.05.001
10. Ferrara G., Brunetti G. Influence of foliar applications of humic acids on yield and fruit quality of table grape cv. Italia. Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin. 2008. Vol. 42. No. 2 https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2008.42.2.822
11. Ferrara G., Brunetti G. Effects of the times of application of a soil humic acid on berry quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv Italia. Span J Agric Res. 2010. No. 8(3). P. 817–822. https://doi.org/10.5424/1283
12. Ibrahim M.M, Ali A.A. Effect of Humic Acid on Productivity and Quality of Superior Seedless Grape Cultivar. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2016. V. 5(2). P. 239–246. ISSN 2077-4605
13. Irani H., Valizadeh Kaji B., Naeini M.R. Biostimulant-induced drought tolerance in grapevine is associated with physiological and biochemical changes. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021. No. 8. P. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-020-00200-9
14. Jindo K., Goron T.L., Pizarro-Tobías P. et al. Application of biostimulant products and biological control agents in sustainable viticulture: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022. Vol.13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.932311
15. Sabir А., Sagdic К., Sabir F.K. Vermicompost, humic acid and urea pulverizations as sustainable practices to increase grape yield and quality on the face of climatic extremities. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 2021. No. 14(2). P. 114-123.
16. OIV. Descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species (2nd edition). 2018. http://www.oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/description-of-grape-varieties/oiv-descriptor-list-for-grape-varieties-and-vitis-species-2nd-edition
17. Popescu G.C., Popescu M. Yield, berry quality and physiological response of grapevine to foliar humic acid application. Crop production and management. 2018. Bragantia 77 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017030
18. Šimanský V., Wójcik-Gront E., Horváthová J. et al. Changes in Relationships between Humic Substances and Soil Structure following Different Mineral Fertilization of Vitis vinifera L. in Slovakia. Agronomy. 2022. No. 12. 1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061460
19. Yilmaz Y., Gazioglu Sensoy R. The Use of Biostimulants in Sustainable Viticulture. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology. 2021. No. 11(2). P. 846–856. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.831987
20. http://rostok72.ru/produktsiya/osobyennosti-tyekhnologii (интернет-ресурс).

GOST	Salimov V. The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions // Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science. – 2024. – Issue number 4 C. 50-54 . URL: https://vestrsnras.ru/10-31857-s2500208224040083-1/?version_id=111826. DOI: 10.31857/S2500208224040083
MLA	Salimov, V. S "The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions." Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science. 4 (2024).:50-54. DOI: 10.31857/S2500208224040083
APA	Salimov V. (2024). The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions. Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science. no. 4, pp.50-54 DOI: 10.31857/S2500208224040083

RAS Agricultural ScienceВестник российской сельскохозяйственной науки Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science

The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions

You can

References

Индексирование

RAS Agricultural ScienceВестник российской сельскохозяйственной науки Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science

The humic acids influence on the quantity and quality of table grape varieties under the Absheron peninsula conditions

You can

References

Индексирование

Via social network