- PII
- S2500208225030161-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S2500208225030161
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 3
- Pages
- 79-83
- Abstract
- Functional imbalances have been identified that have a significant impact on the development of the real sector of the economy and the organization of reproductive processes in perennial agrocenoses, causing a decrease in functional and system-wide stability as a result of the negative impact of macroeconomic processes, factors of chemical and man-made intensification and climatic factors. The necessity of developing digitalized technologies for managing biotechnological processes in perennial agrocenoses is substantiated. The main reasons for the low level of digital transformation of processes in the horticulture industry have been identified. The functional load of a number of concepts has been clarified, and, first of all, the fundamental ones, such as biotechnology, bioeconomics, management of biotechnological processes, and digital technologies. The criteria of bioeconomics are systematized, characterizing the optimal balance between biological and economic resources, which allows the system (process) to work in a preset mode and ensure ecological and economic efficiency, biologization and rational use of natural resources. The types of digital technological solutions in the management of biotechnological processes in long-term agrocenoses based on developments in priority areas of research are considered. An algorithm has been developed for creating and analyzing the effectiveness of using digitalized technologies for managing biotechnological processes in complex natural and man-made systems according to the criteria of bioeconomics.
- Keywords
- биотехнологические процессы управление цифровые технологии биоэкономика критерии алгоритм эффективность
- Date of publication
- 03.04.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 2
References
- 1. Егоров Е.А., Шадрина Ж.А., Кочьян Г.А. Управление устойчивостью воспроизводственных процессов в промышленном виноградарстве. Краснодар, 2018. 380 с.
- 2. Егоров Е.А., Шадрина Ж.А., Подгорная М.Е., Кочьян Г.А. Цифровые технологии управления биотехнологическими процессами защиты насаждений яблони. Краснодар, 2024. 127 с.
- 3. Коробейников Д.А. Модель цифровой экосистемы агропромышленного комплекса // Вестник университета. 2023. № 1 (1). С. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-83-91
- 4. Меденников В.И. Цифровая экосистема АПК: научный подход // Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. 2022. № 2. С. 116-119. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2022_65_2_116
- 5. Петрова Л.А., Бадеева Е.А., Малахова Ю.В. Конвергенция ключевых цифровых технологий в бизнес-практике // ЭТАП: Экономическая Теория, Анализ, Практика. 2024. № 2. С. 31-52. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6435-2024-2-31-52
- 6. Sozaeva T., Gurfova S., Marius-Sorin D., Pshigosheva A. Path of sustainable development of agricultural ecosystems in the context of digitalization // E3S Web Conf., 262 (2021) 03018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126203018
- 7. Vakulenko A., Garafonova, O. The development of innovative digital enterprises in the era of transformational economic changes // Economics & Education. Vol. 9. Vol. 3. P. 43-51. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2024-3-6
- 8. Yang Weibo. Digital Transformation In Biotech: The Competitive Advantage In Biotech Companies // Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. Vol. 27. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb1329
